Posted February 02, 2018 04:03:38 I don’t know about you, but I’m a little bit scared of this guy.
This guy seems to be an economist, but he’s also an economist.
In fact, he’s written several books on economics.
He’s been a professor at a number of universities and has been a columnist for a number, many newspapers.
And he’s got an excellent track record.
But, he also has some pretty strange views.
For example, he thinks that people shouldn’t have their money stashed in banks.
He thinks that it’s a good idea to give the government money.
And yet, he wants the Government to spend more money than the private sector does.
He wants the government to spend less money than private companies do.
He doesn’t think the best way to do this is through government spending.
So, in short, he doesn’t have a lot of ideas on how to make this country work better.
But if he were to be a politician, he’d probably be interested in reforming some of the other aspects of the economic system.
So I’m going to explain what I mean by the ‘trickle-down’ economics.
A trickle-down economics is one that seeks to increase economic growth in order to reduce inequality.
For some, this is a good way of making the world better for everyone.
For others, it’s not.
So what is trickle-downs?
What does it mean?
The term ‘trick’ is a bit misleading because the term is often used to describe an economic policy.
And, it often comes from a place of political disagreement.
A lot of times, when you talk about trickle-up economics, you’re talking about policies that seek to reduce economic inequality.
But when you look at what trickle- down economists have to say about inequality, it makes no sense.
The key point here is that economic growth is the key driver of inequality.
And economic growth can be measured in terms of GDP per capita.
So the way we measure economic growth, for example, is how many people are employed.
And the way you measure economic inequality is how much the top 1 per cent of earners earn compared to everyone else.
And it’s also important to note that this is not an exact science.
Inequality is a function of social class.
If you are a rich person and you have a nice house, you can buy a nice car and go to work for the Government.
If the poorest people in Australia live in remote communities, their jobs are less important to them and they don’t have the ability to buy a good house.
So if you are poor, you have less of a need to work and you’re more likely to go to the Government and get a job.
The other key point to note is that the government does have a duty to give people a good standard of living.
The Government does have an obligation to help people who are poor.
But that is because the Government is the employer of the workforce.
And if you’re poor, the employer is not going to be happy if you go to them for a job that they don.
The problem with trickle- Down economics is that they are not true to reality.
When you look back over the history of the economy, the economic growth rate has tended to be lower in the past.
That is because in the early 20th century, many people had more time and money to spend on their family and their hobbies.
They had more money and a lot more leisure.
And we know that this has contributed to inequality in the United States.
But what has happened is that this trend has reversed itself.
In the 1980s, the United Kingdom saw a rise in the labour market as a result of the war.
So as the war ended, many of those who were in work got back to work.
The unemployment rate in the UK fell.
The number of people who were unemployed dropped.
But the trend towards higher levels of economic inequality has been reversed.
The rise in inequality in recent decades has been caused by people having more time to spend and more leisure time.
It’s a reversal of the rise in economic growth.
It has happened because of a decline in the amount of money that was being spent on labour.
In other words, people have less money to invest.
And that means the economic activity that is required to generate the output of the nation, such as manufacturing, services, and capital investment, is reduced.
And this is why, for many people, the rise of inequality in our country has been driven by inequality in income.
And so what’s the solution?
It’s time to talk about what to do about inequality.
It seems to me that there is a lot to be said for a basic income.
We need to think about what’s appropriate and what’s not appropriate.
And I think that a basic salary would be a good start.
It would be something that everyone could get their hands on and could put